All analyses were performed at the Anti-Doping Laboratory of Mexico in Mexico City,
which served as a satellite laboratory of Barcelona’s WADA accredited laboratory during
the Games. Given that the Anti-Doping Laboratory of Mexico had not yet been accredited
by WADA, the only solution was to use the provision of the International Standard for
Laboratories to work under the supervision of the ISO certification and WADA
accreditation of the Accredited Anti-Doping Laboratory of Barcelona as a satellite
laboratory. The IO Team did not visit the Anti-Doping Laboratory of Mexico but taking
into consideration the information that was available, it seemed that the laboratory was
well equipped and had adequate facilities to analyze the large number of urine and blood
samples collected during the Games. Direction of the satellite laboratory was assumed
by Prof. Jordi Segura and the scientific, analytic and quality management was assumed
by two other members of the same laboratory, namely Dr. José António Pascual and Dr.
Rosa Ventura. Many experts from the Anti-Doping Laboratory of Barcelona were also
present to assist with the sample analysis.
All analytical reports were inputted and received through ADAMS, with the exception of
the reports issued at the beginning of the Games. This was a very efficient way to record
results and, although some minor problems were observed, the IO Team recognized the
benefit to the laboratories and the Major Games Organizers in using ADAMS.
The IO Team supported the decision of the PASO MC to request the analysis of the
sample related with a non-conformity reported by the Anti-Doping Laboratory of Mexico,
where a different “turbidity” between the A and B sample coming from the same athlete
was found.
http://www.vogaz.com
No comments:
Post a Comment